4.4 Article

Necrosis-induced apoptosis promotes regeneration in Drosophila wing imaginal discs

期刊

GENETICS
卷 219, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab144

关键词

regeneration; cell death; Drosophila; apoptosis; gene expression; necrosis; imaginal disc

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [1 R21 HD102765-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regeneration is a complex process that requires a coordinated genetic response to tissue loss. Necrosis can stimulate regeneration at an equivalent level to apoptosis, but also results in significant apoptosis far from the site of ablation, termed necrosis-induced apoptosis (NiA). This programmed cell death at a distance from the injury promotes regeneration by limiting proliferation.
Regeneration is a complex process that requires a coordinated genetic response to tissue loss. Signals from dying cells are crucial to this process and are best understood in the context of regeneration following programmed cell death, like apoptosis. Conversely, regeneration following unregulated forms of death, such as necrosis, have yet to be fully explored. Here, we have developed a method to investigate regeneration following necrosis using the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. We show that necrosis stimulates regeneration at an equivalent level to that of apoptosis-mediated cell death and activates a similar response at the wound edge involving localized JNK signaling. Unexpectedly, however, necrosis also results in significant apoptosis far from the site of ablation, which we have termed necrosis-induced apoptosis (NiA). This apoptosis occurs independent of changes at the wound edge and importantly does not rely on JNK signaling. Furthermore, we find that blocking NiA limits proliferation and subsequently inhibits regeneration, suggesting that tissues damaged by necrosis can activate programmed cell death at a distance from the injury to promote regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据