4.6 Article

Shedding Light on the Formation and Structure of Kombucha Biofilm Using Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.725379

关键词

kombucha; biofilm; cellulose; interaction; two-photon fluorescence microscopy

资金

  1. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne France-Comte
  2. European Union through the PO FEDER-FSE Bourgogne 2014/2020 programs
  3. Biomere (Paris, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kombucha pellicles, produced by acetic acid bacteria and yeasts, show a layered structure where yeast cells act as scaffolding for bacterial cellulose accumulation. The sublayer rich in biomass is crucial for cellulose production and optimizing yeast-AAB metabolic interactions. Yeasts significantly impact the structure and properties of kombucha pellicles compared to those grown from pure AAB cultures.
Kombucha pellicles are often used as inoculum to produce this beverage and have become a signature feature. This cellulosic biofilm produced by acetic acid bacteria (AAB) involves yeasts, which are also part of the kombucha consortia. The role of microbial interactions in the de novo formation and structure of kombucha pellicles was investigated during the 3 days following inoculation, using two-photon microscopy coupled with fluorescent staining. Aggregated yeast cells appear to serve as scaffolding to which bacterial cellulose accumulates. This initial foundation leads to a layered structure characterized by a top cellulose-rich layer and a biomass-rich sublayer. This sublayer is expected to be the microbiologically active site for cellulose production and spatial optimization of yeast-AAB metabolic interactions. The pellicles then grow in thickness while expanding their layered organization. A comparison with pellicles grown from pure AAB cultures shows differences in consistency and structure that highlight the impact of yeasts on the structure and properties of kombucha pellicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据