4.6 Article

Microbial Enzymatic Synthesis of Amikacin Analogs With Antibacterial Activity Against Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.725916

关键词

amikacin analogs; microbial enzymatic synthesis; multidrug-resistant pathogens; antibacterial activity; cytotoxicity

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) [2019R1A2B5B03069338, 2021R1C1C2006260, 2020R1A2C2008061]
  2. Ministry of Education [2021R1I1A1A01054461]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1C1C2006260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized new aminoglycoside antibiotics enzymatically, with structural modifications enhancing their antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria while reducing nephrotoxicity.
With the constant emergence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, interest in the development of new aminoglycoside (AG) antibiotics for clinical use has increased. The regioselective modification of AG scaffolds could be an efficient approach for the development of new antibiotics with improved therapeutic potency. We enzymatically synthesized three amikacin analogs containing structural modifications in the amino groups and evaluated their antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity. Among them, 6 '-N-acyl-3('')-N-methylated analogs showed improved antibacterial activity against the multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria tested, while exhibiting reduced in vitro nephrotoxicity compared to amikacin. This study demonstrated that the modifications of the 6 '-amino group as well as the 3('')-amino group have noteworthy advantages for circumventing the AG-resistance mechanism. The regiospecific enzymatic modification could be exploited to develop novel antibacterial agents with improved pharmacological potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据