4.6 Review

Co-infections as Modulators of Disease Outcome: Minor Players or Major Players?

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664386

关键词

co-infection; HIV; HCV; MTB; oxidative stress; immune response; disease severity

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) [MLP-2005]
  2. Fondation Botnar [CLP-0031]
  3. Indo-US Science and Technology Forum (IUSSTF) [CLP-0033]
  4. Intel [CLP-0034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interaction between human host and pathogen is dynamic and may be modulated by co-pathogens, impacting disease severity and clinical outcomes. Studies suggest that co-infections play a role in impacting the outcome of COVID-19 infection.
Human host and pathogen interaction is dynamic in nature and often modulated by co-pathogens with a functional role in delineating the physiological outcome of infection. Co-infection may present either as a pre-existing pathogen which is accentuated by the introduction of a new pathogen or may appear in the form of new infection acquired secondarily due to a compromised immune system. Using diverse examples of co-infecting pathogens such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Hepatitis C Virus, we have highlighted the role of co-infections in modulating disease severity and clinical outcome. This interaction happens at multiple hierarchies, which are inclusive of stress and immunological responses and together modulate the disease severity. Already published literature provides much evidence in favor of the occurrence of co-infections during SARS-CoV-2 infection, which eventually impacts the Coronavirus disease-19 outcome. The availability of biological models like 3D organoids, mice, cell lines and mathematical models provide us with an opportunity to understand the role and mechanism of specific co-infections. Exploration of multi-omics-based interactions across co-infecting pathogens may provide deeper insights into their role in disease modulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据