4.8 Article

An ABA-GA bistable switch can account for natural variation in the variability of Arabidopsis seed germination time

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59485

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Gatsby Charitable Foundation [GAT3272/GLC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetically identical plants can display heterogeneous phenotypes under the same conditions, and a study on Arabidopsis seed germination time has revealed the underlying mechanisms of this phenotypic variability. The research identified genetic loci and genes involved in modulating abscisic acid sensitivity, showing that the ABA-GA network acts as a bistable switch in the decision to germinate. A simple stochastic model of this network was validated through experimental observations, providing a foundation for understanding phenotypic variability in germination time.
Genetically identical plants growing in the same conditions can display heterogeneous phenotypes. Here we use Arabidopsis seed germination time as a model system to examine phenotypic variability and its underlying mechanisms. We show extensive variation in seed germination time variability between Arabidopsis accessions and use a multiparent recombinant inbred population to identify two genetic loci involved in this trait. Both loci include genes implicated in modulating abscisic acid (ABA) sensitivity. Mutually antagonistic regulation between ABA, which represses germination, and gibberellic acid (GA), which promotes germination, underlies the decision to germinate and can act as a bistable switch. A simple stochastic model of the ABA-GA network shows that modulating ABA sensitivity can generate the range of germination time distributions we observe experimentally. We validate the model by testing its predictions on the effects of exogenous hormone addition. Our work provides a foundation for understanding the mechanism and functional role of phenotypic variability in germination time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据