4.8 Article

Variations of intracellular density during the cell cycle arise from tip-growth regulation in fission yeast

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.64901

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has found that dry-mass density in fission yeast exhibits homeostatic behavior but varies during the cell cycle, largely influenced by a constant rate of biomass synthesis, slowdown of volume growth during cell division, and rapid expansion post-cytokinesis. Density changes are exacerbated by arrests at specific cell-cycle stages, and spatially heterogeneous patterns of density suggest links with density regulation, tip growth, and intracellular osmotic pressure. The systematic density variations during the cell cycle are predominantly due to modulation of volume expansion, revealing functional consequences of density gradients and cell-cycle arrests.
Intracellular density impacts the physical nature of the cytoplasm and can globally affect cellular processes, yet density regulation remains poorly understood. Here, using a new quantitative phase imaging method, we determined that dry-mass density in fission yeast is maintained in a narrow distribution and exhibits homeostatic behavior. However, density varied during the cell cycle, decreasing during G2, increasing in mitosis and cytokinesis, and dropping rapidly at cell birth. These density variations were explained by a constant rate of biomass synthesis, coupled to slowdown of volume growth during cell division and rapid expansion post-cytokinesis. Arrest at specific cell-cycle stages exacerbated density changes. Spatially heterogeneous patterns of density suggested links between density regulation, tip growth, and intracellular osmotic pressure. Our results demonstrate that systematic density variations during the cell cycle are predominantly due to modulation of volume expansion, and reveal functional consequences of density gradients and cell-cycle arrests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据