4.8 Article

Cortico-autonomic local arousals and heightened somatosensory arousability during NREMS of mice in neuropathic pain

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.65835

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_184759, 310030_179169, 320030-179194]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_179169, 320030_179194, 310030_184759] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified a vulnerable interval in NREMS for microarousals in healthy mice and observed increased arousability in mice with chronic pain. This suggests that sleep disorders and chronic pain-related sleep disturbances may be linked to perturbed arousability rather than changes in sleep architecture.
Frequent nightly arousals typical for sleep disorders cause daytime fatigue and present health risks. As such arousals are often short, partial, or occur locally within the brain, reliable characterization in rodent models of sleep disorders and in human patients is challenging. We found that the EEG spectral composition of non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) in healthy mice shows an infraslow (similar to 50 s) interval over which microarousals appear preferentially. NREMS could hence be vulnerable to abnormal arousals on this time scale. Chronic pain is well-known to disrupt sleep. In the spared nerve injury (SNI) mouse model of chronic neuropathic pain, we found more numerous local cortical arousals accompanied by heart rate increases in hindlimb primary somatosensory, but not in prelimbic, cortices, although sleep macroarchitecture appeared unaltered. Closed-loop mechano-vibrational stimulation further revealed higher sensory arousability. Chronic pain thus preserved conventional sleep measures but resulted in elevated spontaneous and evoked arousability. We develop a novel moment-to-moment probing of NREMS vulnerability and propose that chronic pain-induced sleep complaints arise from perturbed arousability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据