4.8 Article

Misic, a general deep learning-based method for the high-throughput cell segmentation of complex bacterial communities

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.65151

关键词

Deep learning; image analysis; microscopy; myxococcus xanthus; biofilms; B; subtilis; E; coli; Other

类别

资金

  1. ERC Advanced Grant
  2. ANR [ANR-14-CE09-0025-01, ANR-15-CE11-0023]
  3. CNRS within a 80-Prime initiative
  4. Aix-Marseille University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MiSiC is a deep-learning based 2D segmentation method that can automatically segment single bacteria in complex images of interacting bacterial communities with very little parameter adjustment, independent of microscopy settings and imaging modality. It enables the analysis of interspecies interactions and subcellular processes in millimeter size datasets. MiSiC's simple implementation and low computing power requirement make it accessible to fields interested in bacterial interactions and cell biology.
Studies of bacterial communities, biofilms and microbiomes, are multiplying due to their impact on health and ecology. Live imaging of microbial communities requires new tools for the robust identification of bacterial cells in dense and often inter-species populations, sometimes over very large scales. Here, we developed MiSiC, a general deep-learning-based 2D segmentation method that automatically segments single bacteria in complex images of interacting bacterial communities with very little parameter adjustment, independent of the microscopy settings and imaging modality. Using a bacterial predator-prey interaction model, we demonstrate that MiSiC enables the analysis of interspecies interactions, resolving processes at subcellular scales and discriminating between species in millimeter size datasets. The simple implementation of MiSiC and the relatively low need in computing power make its use broadly accessible to fields interested in bacterial interactions and cell biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据