4.1 Article

Identification of QTLs for resistant starch and total alkaloid content in brown and polished rice

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15037268

关键词

Resistant starch; Total alkaloids; Quantitative trait locus; Brown and polished rice

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31060186]
  2. Science and Technology to Benefit the People [2014RA060]
  3. Independent Project of Agricultural Biotechnology Key Laboratory of Yunnan Province [YBRI201503]
  4. Exploit of Emphases New Production [2014BD001]
  5. Yunnan Introduction and Foster Talent Program from Yunnan Provincial Scientific and Technology Department [2012HB050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An F-3 population consisting of 117 F-2:3 families derived from a cross between two varieties of rice, Gongmi No. 3 and Diantun 502, with a large difference in their resistant starch and total alkaloid content, was used for quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping. Two QTLs of resistant starch for rice (qRS7-1, qRS7-2) were identified in a linkage group on chromosome 7, which could explain phenotypic variance from 7.6 to 17.3%, due to additive effects for resistant starch from Gongmi No. 3 or over-dominance effects for qRS7-2 of the marker interval (RM3404-RM478) on chromosome 7 from Gongmi No. 3, accounting for 13.8-17.3% of the phenotypic variance. Two QTLs of total alkaloids for brown rice (qALb7-1, qALb7-2) were identified in the same linkage group, which could explain phenotypic variance from 7.7 and 19.3%, respectively, due to dominance or over-dominance effects for total alkaloids on chromosome 7 from Diantun 502. To our knowledge, these are the first QTLs to be identified, which are related to resistant starch and total alkaloid content in rice. These results are beneficial for understanding the genetic basis of, as well as for developing markers linked with, resistant starch and total alkaloids of functional components for marker-assisted selection breeding in rice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据