4.5 Article

Long-term trends in marine turtle size at maturity at an important Atlantic rookery

期刊

ECOSPHERE
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3631

关键词

Caretta caretta; Chelonia mydas; life stage assessment; long-term monitoring; marine turtle; size at maturity; size trends

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study on nesting female turtles in Florida revealed that their minimum size at maturity intervals were lower than previous estimates and had significant changes over the study period. These shifts may have been the result of changes in population demographics, habitat quality, and behavioral reactions.
For species reaching maturity at a range of ages or sizes, factors that influence juvenile growth and size at maturity may have lasting impacts on overall fitness. Assessing when animals reach maturity is especially challenging for species which are difficult to follow through time as a result of highly migratory behavior, long life spans, or both. We examined nesting female size in a reproductive assemblage of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and loggerheads (Caretta caretta) on the east coast of Florida, USA. We used a long-term dataset from 1982 to 2019 to estimate a minimum size at maturity interval on the basis of two standard deviations below mean female size for each species. The minimum size intervals for green turtles (81.4-89.3 cm) and loggerheads (68.1-79.1 cm) were lower than most previous estimates in the literature, many of which were simply the smallest individual ever observed. There was a significant decrease in the upper bound of the minimum size interval over the study period for both green turtles (1.6 cm) and loggerheads (4.1 cm). These shifts in size at maturity may be the result of changes in population demographics, habitat quality, and behavioral reactions to these changes. The development and periodic reassessment of robust estimators of maturity are an important part of programs centered around the monitoring and conservation of vulnerable wildlife populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据