4.5 Article

Atlantic Nino/Nina Prediction Skills in NMME Models

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos12070803

关键词

Atlantic Nino; Nina; seasonal prediction skill; relationship between Atlantic Nino; Nina and ENSO prediction skills; North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME) models

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program on Monitoring, Early Warning and Prevention of Major Natural Disaster [2019YFC1510004, 2018YFC1506002]
  2. NSFC [42005020, 42088101, 41630423]
  3. NSF [AGS-2006553]
  4. NSF of Jiangsu [BK20190781]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction skill of Atlantic Nino/Nina has been improved, with the multi-model ensemble reaching five months, but it is season-dependent, showing a marked decrease in spring prediction ability.
The Atlantic Nino/Nina, one of the dominant interannual variability in the equatorial Atlantic, exerts prominent influence on the Earth's climate, but its prediction skill shown previously was unsatisfactory and limited to two to three months. By diagnosing the recently released North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME) models, we find that the Atlantic Nino/Nina prediction skills are improved, with the multi-model ensemble (MME) reaching five months. The prediction skills are season-dependent. Specifically, they show a marked dip in boreal spring, suggesting that the Atlantic Nino/Nina prediction suffers a spring predictability barrier like ENSO. The prediction skill is higher for Atlantic Nina than for Atlantic Nino, and better in the developing phase than in the decaying phase. The amplitude bias of the Atlantic Nino/Nina is primarily attributed to the amplitude bias in the annual cycle of the equatorial sea surface temperature (SST). The anomaly correlation coefficient scores of the Atlantic Nino/Nina, to a large extent, depend on the prediction skill of the Nino3.4 index in the preceding boreal winter, implying that the precedent ENSO may greatly affect the development of Atlantic Nino/Nina in the following boreal summer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据