4.1 Article

Influence of COL1A2 gene variants on the incidence of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in a Chinese population

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15017369

关键词

Type I collagen; COL1A2; Polymorphism; Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type I collagen (transcribed by COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes) is important for maintaining vessel wall elasticity and is a critical part of the extracellular matrix. We conducted a case-control study to investigate the role of the COL1A2 rs42524 polymorphism in the development of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Between January 2012 and December 2014, a total of 227 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and 227 controls were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Yanan University (China). Genotyping of the COL1A2 rs42524 polymorphism was performed using polymerase chain reaction coupled with restriction fragment length polymorphism. By logistic regression analysis, we found that the CC genotype was associated with increased risk of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage as compared to the GG genotype (OR = 12.67, 95% CI = 3.03-112.11). In a dominant model, the GC + CC genotype of the COL1A2 rs42524 polymorphism was associated with a 2.57-fold increased risk of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage as compared to the GG genotype. In a recessive model, the CC genotype of the COL1A2 rs42524 polymorphism was correlated with a higher risk of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage as compared to the GG + GC genotype (OR = 12.07, 95% CI = 2.89-106.75). The GC and CC genotypes of the COL1A2 rs42524 polymorphism were associated with a substantial risk of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage among patients who consumed alcohol and used tobacco. In conclusion, our study suggests that the COL1A2 rs42524 polymorphism is associated with the development of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, particularly in conjunction with tobacco use and alcohol consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据