4.6 Article

Deep Eutectic Solvents as Efficient Catalysts for Fixation of CO2 to Cyclic Carbonates at Ambient Temperature and Pressure through Synergetic Catalysis

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 31, 页码 10437-10443

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03187

关键词

Carbon dioxide; Deep eutectic solvents; Cyclic carbonates; Ionic liquids; Synergetic catalysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Special Foundation of Guizhou University [X2019065]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Science and Technology Department [2021068, 2021069]
  3. Characteristic Field Project of Education Department in Guizhou Province [2021055]
  4. Guizhou University Cultivation Project [201955]
  5. Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents Team Project of Guizhou Province [20185607]
  6. One Hundred Person Project of Guizhou Province [20165655]
  7. Innovation Group Project of Education Department in Guizhou Province [2021010]
  8. Guizhou Province Graduate Research Fund [2020044]
  9. College Student Innovation Fund of Guizhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of deep eutectic solvents (DESs) consisting of protic ionic liquids (PILs) and amines exhibit effective catalytic activity for the fixation of CO2 to cyclic carbonates, achieving high yields and stable catalytic activity. Mechanistic research reveals simultaneous activation of CO2 and epoxides through the synergistic catalysis of PILs and amines in these deep eutectic solvents.
A series of deep eutectic solvents (DESs), consisting of protic ionic liquids (PILs) and amines, feature effective catalytic activity for the fixation of CO2 to cyclic carbonates at ambient temperature and pressure without any solvents and additives. Good yields of cyclic carbonates are achieved (up to 99%), and no obvious deactivation in catalytic activity is found after five cycles. Mechanistic research reveals that CO2 and epoxides are activated simultaneously through the synergistic catalysis of PILs and amines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据