4.6 Article

What's on the Menu for the Resident Brown Trout in a Rich Limestone Stream?

期刊

WATER
卷 13, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13182492

关键词

brown trout diet; feeding ecology; diet diversity; selectivity; ontogenetic shift

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-9/2021-14/200007, 451-03-9/2021-14/200178]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that despite aquatic prey being the major part of brown trout diet, terrestrial organisms were also important prey in a food-rich stream, especially in September. There were differences in diet among age classes of brown trout, with younger individuals tending towards a more generalist strategy.
Examination of brown trout seasonal diet variation and investigation of terrestrial prey importance in a food-rich stream using four indices of prey importance (number and weight abundance, frequency of occurrence, index of relative importance) revealed that aquatic prey constituted the major part of the diet (>90%) throughout the examined period. Despite Gammaridae being the most abundant in the environment, other less abundant organisms appeared to be important prey, including terrestrial organisms, with maximum consumption in September. The electivity index showed a positive selection of rare prey types; Tokeshi's model revealed a specialist strategy for most of the population, except for those of 1+ age, who were inclining to generalist strategy. Diet diversity increased throughout April to October, and ages 1+ and 2+ exhibited a more diverse diet than older ages. Diet overlap between age classes was considerable, with less overlap observed in the later season. This pattern of differentiation in the diet of brown trout age classes and their feeding plasticity over seasonal scales, as observed in this food-rich stream, provides a starting point for further examination of this topic in streams with similar or different food richness and availability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据