4.6 Article

In-Stream Variability of Litter Breakdown and Consequences on Environmental Monitoring

期刊

WATER
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13162246

关键词

organic matter recycling; natural variability; leaf litter decomposition; geomorphological factors

资金

  1. Brittany Region
  2. Nigerian government throughout the TET fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the spatial variability of leaf litter decomposition rates and its drivers in forested streams at the local scale. It found that streambed roughness was negatively related to decomposition rate and was the most important factor influencing both total and microbial decomposition.
Energy derived from leaf litter decomposition fuels food webs in forested streams. However, the natural spatial variability of the decomposition rate of leaf litter and the relative contributions of its drivers are poorly known at the local scale. This study aims to determine the natural in-stream variability of leaf litter decomposition rates in successive riffles and to quantify the factors involved in this key ecosystem process at the local scale. Experiments were conducted on six successive riffles in nine streams in north-western France to monitor the decomposition rate in fine (microbial decomposition, kf) and coarse (total decomposition, kc) mesh bags. We recorded 30 +/- 2% (mean +/- S.E.) variation in kc among riffles and 43 +/- 4% among streams. kf variability was 15 +/- 1% among riffles and 20 +/- 3% among streams. However, in-stream variability was higher than between-stream variability in four of the nine streams. Streambed roughness was negatively related to decomposition and was the most important factor for both total and microbial decomposition. Our study shows that the natural variability of the decomposition rate resulting from the local morphological conditions of habitats could be very important and should be taken into consideration in studies using leaf litter assays as a bio-indicator of anthropogenic impacts in streams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据