4.2 Article

Soil quality in volcanic soils in a forest biosphere reserve in Mexico

期刊

SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 217-227

出版社

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/108/2020-SWR

关键词

Andisol; forest soil; land use and management

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Council, CONACyT [480806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forest soils in different zones of a temperate forest in Mexico showed significant differences in soil quality index, with the zone of preserved pine forest having the highest SQI values. Linear score indices from PCA were more effective in differentiating calculated SQI values.
Forest soils respond dramatically to management changes compared to other soils influenced by different land-use forms. This work aimed to compare the soil conditions in four different zones in a temperate forest in a bio-sphere reserve in Mexico, using a minimum data set (MDS) based on volcanic soils properties to develop a soil quality index (SQI). For this purpose, two different MDSs were used, one obtained from an expert opinion and the other through a multivariate principal component analysis (PCA). The soil quality assessment was conducted in a biosphere reserve in Mexico, where volcanic soils predominate. Four different areas were studied. Overall, six different types of SQI were calculated for each area, for which linear and nonlinear functions were used and the additive and weighted method. The six SQI showed a significant difference between the four areas of study. The zone with the highest SQI values was the zone with a preserved pine forest, followed by the zone with a pine forest managed by the population, and the zones with a pine forest and grassland in recovery showed the lowest SQI. The linear score indices obtained by the PCA indicated the better ability to differentiate the calculated SQI values, which would provide information to contribute to the stakeholder management and decision making in the protection, conservation and management of the ecosystems present in the biosphere reserve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据