4.7 Article

Global Ocean Studies from CALIOP/CALIPSO by Removing Polarization Crosstalk Effects

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13142769

关键词

CALIPSO; space lidar; ocean; depolarization ratio; crosstalk

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC20K0129, 80NSSC21K0910]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies show that CALIOP aboard the CALIPSO satellite offers valuable information on ocean phytoplankton distributions, but due to polarization crosstalk effects, using crosstalk-corrected signals is recommended to avoid biases in ocean subsurface studies.
Recent studies indicate that the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite provides valuable information about ocean phytoplankton distributions. CALIOP's attenuated backscatter coefficients, measured at 532 nm in receiver channels oriented parallel and perpendicular to the laser's linear polarization plane, are significantly improved in the Version 4 data product. However, due to non-ideal instrument effects, a small fraction of the backscattered optical power polarized parallel to the receiver polarization reference plane is misdirected into the perpendicular channel, and vice versa. This effect, known as polarization crosstalk, typically causes the measured perpendicular signal to be higher than its true value and the measured parallel signal to be lower than its true value. Therefore, the ocean optical properties derived directly from CALIOP's measured signals will be biased if the polarization crosstalk effect is not taken into account. This paper presents methods that can be used to estimate the CALIOP crosstalk effects from on-orbit measurements. The global ocean depolarization ratios calculated both before and after removing the crosstalk effects are compared. Using CALIOP crosstalk-corrected signals is highly recommended for all ocean subsurface studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据