4.7 Article

Actual and Forecasted Vulnerability Assessment to Seawater Intrusion via GALDIT-SUSI in the Volturno River Mouth (Italy)

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13183632

关键词

groundwater salinization; coastal aquifer; subsidence rate; interferometry; GIS

资金

  1. V:ALERE 2020 Program (VAnviteLli pEr la RicErca) of the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coastal areas are increasingly vulnerable to groundwater salinization due to the effects of climate change and anthropization. The GALDIT-SUSI methodology was used to assess seawater intrusion in the Volturno River floodplain, showing a marked increase in salinization vulnerability by 2050, driven by the Revelle index.
Coastal areas have become increasingly vulnerable to groundwater salinization, especially in the last century, due to the combined effects of climate change and growing anthropization. In this study, a novel methodology named GALDIT-SUSI was applied in the floodplain of the Volturno River mouth for the current (2018) and future (2050) evaluation of seawater intrusion accounting for the expected subsidence and groundwater salinization rates. Several input variables such as digital surface model, land use classification, subsidence rate and drainage system have been mapped via remote sensing resources. The current assessment highlights how areas affected by salinization coincide with the semiperennial lagoons and inland depressed areas where paleosaline groundwaters are present. The future assessment (2050) shows a marked increase of salinization vulnerability in the coastal strip and in the most depressed areas. The results highlight that the main vulnerability driver is the Revelle index, while predicted subsidence and recharge rates will only slightly affect groundwater salinization. This case study indicates that GALDIT-SUSI is a reliable and easy-to-use tool for the assessment of groundwater salinization in many coastal regions of the world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据