4.7 Article

An Integration of UAV-Based Photogrammetry and 3D Modelling for Rockfall Hazard Assessment: The Carcavos Case in 2018 (Spain)

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13173450

关键词

rockfall; UAV; 3DPC; 3D modelling; hazard assessment; Spain

资金

  1. Castilla-La Mancha Regional Government (Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Development)
  2. Interreg SUDOE Program [SOE3/P4/E0868]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the combined use of UAV photogrammetry and rockfall numerical simulation to analyze a case of fragmental rockfall, identify source areas and potential risks, and evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures. By generating a high-resolution 3D model and conducting numerical simulations, the paths, speeds, impacts, and stopping points of fragmented rocks were determined, leading to the identification of potential hazards and assessment of risk mitigation strategies.
An example of the combined use of UAV photogrammetry and rockfall numerical simulation is described. A case of fragmental rockfall occurred on 17 November 2018 in Carcavos, a site located in the Spanish municipality of Ayna (Albacete). The event caused a great social alarm as some infrastructure was affected. By using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry, a high-resolution 3D model has been generated from point cloud data, and distribution and size of the fragmented rocks (more than 600 boulders) determined. The analysis has been performed through numerical simulations to: (1) reproduce the paths followed by the real blocks; and (2) estimate the speed and energy of the blocks, together with their heights, impacts and stopping points. Accordingly, source areas have been identified, including the potential source areas and unstable blocks on the slope. In addition, the exposed elements at risk (buildings, facilities, infrastructures, etc.) have been identified, and the effectiveness of mitigation measures against future events evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据