4.7 Article

Gabor Features Extraction and Land-Cover Classification of Urban Hyperspectral Images for Remote Sensing Applications

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13152914

关键词

feature extraction; urban hyperspectral images; dimension reduction; gabor features; artificial neural network

资金

  1. Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN) (Mexico)
  2. Comision de Operacion y Fomento de Actividades Academicas (COFAA) of IPN
  3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Mexico)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed method reduces data dimension by extracting Gabor texture features and utilizing LDA, followed by classification using ANN to build a data matrix for analysis. It achieves high classification rates but with longer training time compared to non-reduced features.
The principles of the transform stage of the extract, transform and load (ETL) process can be applied to index the data in functional structures for the decision-making inherent in an urban remote sensing application. This work proposes a method that can be utilised as an organisation stage by reducing the data dimension with Gabor texture features extracted from grey-scale representations of the Hue, Saturation and Value (HSV) colour space and the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Additionally, the texture features are reduced using the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) method. Afterwards, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is employed to classify the data and build a tick data matrix indexed by the belonging class of the observations, which could be retrieved for further analysis according to the class selected to explore. The proposed method is compared in terms of classification rates, reduction efficiency and training time against the utilisation of other grey-scale representations and classifiers. This method compresses up to 87% of the original features and achieves similar classification results to non-reduced features but at a higher training time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据