4.7 Article

Polyimide-Derived Carbon-Coated Li4Ti5O12 as High-Rate Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13111672

关键词

Li4Ti5O12; polyimide; carbon coating; lithium ion battery; rate performance

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 104-2113-M-152-001-MY2, MOST 105-2320-B-038-014-, MOST 103-2221-E-131-002-MY2]
  2. CPC Corporation [105-3011]
  3. Taipei Medical University [TMU102-AE1-B02, TMUTOP103004-2]
  4. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan [CMRPG3E2091]
  5. Academia Sinica Research Project on Thematic Project [AS-104-TP-A11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of PI structure on the electrochemical performance of carbon-coated LTO and found that introducing rigid p-PDA units can improve the molecular arrangement of PI, resulting in a more regular graphite structure with fewer defects and higher conductivity. As a result, the carbon-coated LTO exhibited better rate performance with a discharge capacity of 137.5 mAh/g at 20 C, nearly 1.5 times larger than that of bare LTO (94.4 mAh/g).
Carbon-coated Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) has been prepared using polyimide (PI) as a carbon source via the thermal imidization of polyamic acid (PAA) followed by a carbonization process. In this study, the PI with different structures based on pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA), 4,4 '-oxydianiline (ODA), and p-phenylenediamine (p-PDA) moieties have been synthesized. The effect of the PI structure on the electrochemical performance of the carbon-coated LTO has been investigated. The results indicate that the molecular arrangement of PI can be improved when the rigid p-PDA units are introduced into the PI backbone. The carbons derived from the p-PDA-based PI show a more regular graphite structure with fewer defects and higher conductivity. As a result, the carbon-coated LTO exhibits a better rate performance with a discharge capacity of 137.5 mAh/g at 20 C, which is almost 1.5 times larger than that of bare LTO (94.4 mAh/g).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据