4.7 Article

Mixed Micellization and Spectroscopic Studies of Anti-Allergic Drug and Non-Ionic Surfactant in the Presence of Ionic Liquid

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13162756

关键词

diphenhydramine hydrochloride; TX-45; ionic liquid; mixed micelles; synergism; theoretical models

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [G: 341-130-1441]
  2. DSR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the interaction between a drug and a surfactant mixture in various conditions, revealing synergistic behavior at the surface and in bulk. Energetic parameters indicated the thermodynamic advantage of micelle formation and surfactant adsorption. Theoretical models and experimental techniques were used to estimate various physicochemical parameters.
In drug delivery, surfactants are used to reduce side effects and to increase drug efficiency. The present work aimed to study the interaction of diphenhydramine hydrochloride (anti-allergic drug) with TX-45 (non-ionic surfactant) in the absence and presence of ionic liquid (1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride). The physicochemical parameters were estimated by the surface tension measurement. Various theoretical models (Clint, Rubingh, Motomura, and Maeda) were applied to determine the attractive behavior between drug and surfactant mixtures at the surface and in bulk. The drug and surfactant mixtures exhibit synergistic behavior in the absence and presence of ionic liquid. Several energetic parameters were also estimated with the assistance of regular solution approximation and pseudo phase separation model that indicate micelle formation and adsorption of surfactant at the surface is thermodynamically advantageous. The morphology of pure and mixture of amphiphiles has been estimated by the Tanford and Israelachvili theories. UV-visible spectroscopy was used to quantify the attractive behavior of the drug with surfactant with the help of a binding constant (K).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据