4.7 Article

Non-Newtonian Droplet Generation in a Cross-Junction Microfluidic Channel

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13121915

关键词

microfluidics; droplet; cross-junction; non-Newtonian; power-law; CFD

资金

  1. Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester under the Exceptional Woman in Engineering PhD scholarship scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancing the shear-thinning behavior by increasing polymer concentrations in the dispersed phase decreases droplet size and increases detachment time. The choice of a shear-dependent fluid results in decreased droplet size compared to Newtonian fluids, but increased detachment time due to higher apparent viscosity.
A two-dimensional CFD model based on volume-of-fluid (VOF) is introduced to examine droplet generation in a cross-junction microfluidic using an open-source software, OpenFOAM together with an interFoam solver. Non-Newtonian power-law droplets in Newtonian liquid is numerically studied and its effect on droplet size and detachment time in three different regimes, i.e., squeezing, dripping and jetting, are investigated. To understand the droplet formation mechanism, the shear-thinning behaviour was enhanced by increasing the polymer concentrations in the dispersed phase. It is observed that by choosing a shear-dependent fluid, droplet size decreases compared to Newtonian fluids while detachment time increases due to higher apparent viscosity. Moreover, the rheological parameters-n and K in the power-law model-impose a considerable effect on the droplet size and detachment time, especially in the dripping and jetting regimes. Those parameters also have the potential to change the formation regime if the capillary number (Ca) is high enough. This work extends the understanding of non-Newtonian droplet formation in microfluidics to control the droplet characteristics in applications involving shear-thinning polymeric solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据