4.7 Article

Relaxation Phenomena in Chitosan-Au Nanoparticle Thin Films

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13193214

关键词

Au-Chitosan nanocomposite; glass transition; relaxation phenomena; dielectric spectroscopy; dynamic mechanical behavior

资金

  1. CONACYT of Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan-gold nanoparticle thin films were synthesized through chemical reduction of HAuCl4. The behavior of these films was investigated in relation to moisture and HAuCl4 content, revealing two relaxation processes related to glass transition and local diffusion of ions. The HAuCl4 content affected the conductivity of the films, demonstrating a percolation effect.
Chitosan-gold nanoparticle (CS/AuNP) thin films were synthesized through the chemical reduction of HAuCl4 in sodium citrate/chitosan solutions. The dielectric and dynamic mechanical behaviors of CS/AuNP films have been investigated as a function of moisture and HAuCl4 content. Two relaxation processes in the nanocomposites have been observed. The alpha-relaxation process is related to a glass transition in wet CS/AuNP films. However, in dry composites (with 0.2 wt% of moisture content), the glass transition vanished. A second relaxation process was observed from 70 & DEG;C to the onset of thermal degradation (160 & DEG;C) in wet films and from 33 & DEG;C to the onset of degradation in dry films. This relaxation is identified as the sigma-relaxation and may be related to the local diffusion process of ions between high potential barriers in disordered systems. The alpha- and sigma-relaxation processes are affected by the HAuCl4 content of the solutions from which films were obtained because of the interaction between CS, sodium succinate, and gold nanoparticles. With about 0.6 mM of HAuCl4, the conductivity of both wet and dry films sharply increased by six orders, corresponding to the percolation effect, which may be related to the appearance of a conductivity pathway between AuNPs, HAuCl4, and NaCl.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据