4.7 Article

Effect of Core Architecture on Charpy Impact and Compression Properties of Tufted Sandwich Structural Composites

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13101665

关键词

textile composites; sandwich; tufting; compression; Charpy impact

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201808070029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel sandwich structure that enhances mechanical properties by replacing the polypropylene foam core with carbon fiber non-woven material. The results show significant improvements in compressive strength and impact resistance, particularly with the addition of tufting yarns.
This study presents a novel sandwich structure that replaces the polypropylene (PP) foam core with a carbon fiber non-woven material in the tufting process and the liquid resin infusion (LRI) process. An experimental investigation was conducted into the flatwise compression properties and Charpy impact resistance of sandwich composites. The obtained results validate an enhancement to the mechanical properties due to the non-woven core and tufting yarns. Compared to samples with a pure foam core and samples without tufting threads, the compressive strength increased by 45% and 86%, respectively. The sample with a non-woven layer and tufting yarns had the highest Charpy absorbed energy (23.85 Kj/m(2)), which is approximately 66% higher than the samples without a non-woven layer and 90% higher than the samples without tufting yarns. Due to the buckling of the resin cylinders in the Z-direction that occurred in all of the different sandwich samples during the compression test, the classical buckling theory was adopted to analyze the differences between the results. The specific properties of the weight gains are discussed in this paper. The results show that the core layers have a negative effect on impact resistance. Nevertheless, the addition of tufting yarns presents an obvious benefit to all of the specific properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据