4.7 Article

A Slow-Release Fertilizer of Urea Prepared via Melt Blending with Degradable Poly(lactic acid): Formulation and Release Mechanisms

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13111856

关键词

poly(lactic acid); urea; melt blending; slow-release fertilizer

资金

  1. Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education (PTUPT research scheme) in 2018 [089/SP2H/LT/DRPM/2018]
  2. Institute of Research and Community Service, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research demonstrates that the molecular weight of PLA and urea content in SRF affect the release rate, with diffusion within the matrix dominating the urea release process. Empirical models indicate a combination of diffusion and degradation mechanisms best fit the experimental data.
In this research, a low molecular weight poly(lactic acid) (or PLA) synthesized from direct polycondensation was melt compounded with urea to formulate slow-release fertilizer (SRF). We studied the influence of the molecular weight (M-W) of PLA as a matrix and the urea composition of SRF towards release kinetics in water at 30 degrees C. The physical appearance of solid samples, the change in urea concentration, and acidity (pH) of water were monitored periodically during the release test. Three studied empirical models exhibited that diffusion within the matrix dominated the urea release process, especially when the release level was less than 60%. Thus, a lower M-W of PLA and a higher urea content of SRF showed a faster release rate. For the entire length of the release experiment, a combination of diffusion and degradation mechanisms exhibited the best agreement with the experimental data. The hydrolytic degradation of PLA may begin after 96 h of immersion (around 60% release level), followed by the appearance of some micro-holes and cracks on the surface of the SRF samples. Generally, this research revealed the good release performance of urea without residues that damage the soil structure and nutrient balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据