4.1 Article

Amino acid composition of royal jelly harvested at different times after larval transfer

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15038306

关键词

Apis mellifera; Royal jelly; Amino acid; Concentration; Harvest time

资金

  1. fundamental research funds for the Chongqing Science AMP
  2. Technology Commission, China [2014cstc-jbky-01303, 2014cstc-jbky-01302]
  3. Science AMP
  4. Technology Innovation Program of Nanchuan District, Chongqing, China [CX201216]
  5. Chinese Medicinal Science and Technology Project of Chongqing Sanitary Bureau [2012-2-156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amino acids in royal jelly (RJ) have a wide range of pharmacological and health-promoting functions in humans. Multiple studies on the amino acid quality and composition in RJ have investigated RJ harvested at 72 h after larval transfer. In contrast, the concentration of amino acids in RJ harvested before 72 h remains unknown. In this study, the concentration of free amino acids (FAAs) and total amino acids (TAAs) in RJ harvested at 13 time points between 24 and 72 h after transfer of ten Apis mellifera colonies were measured. Our results indicated that the most abundant FAAs were Pro, Phe, Lys, Glu, and Tyr, whereas the most abundant TAAs were Asp, Glu, Leu, Lys, and Val. The total FAA concentration in RJ increased with increasing harvest time, from 4.30 mg/g at 24 h to 9.48 mg/g at 72 h. In contrast, the variation in concentration of TAAs observed was a decrease-increase-decrease trend with 40 h (149.53 mg/g) and 52 h (169.62 mg/g) as inflection points. The highest and lowest concentrations of TAA were 197.96 and 121.32 mg/g at 24 and 72 h, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the concentration changes of FAAs and TAAs prior to 72 h after transfer. Our results will provide theoretical support to guide production practices of beekeeping, as well as elucidate the relationship between the harvest time point and RJ content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据