4.6 Article

Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR): Development of the SIFHR Checklist

期刊

PLOS MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003788

关键词

-

资金

  1. TDR
  2. UNICEF
  3. UNDP
  4. World Bank
  5. WHO
  6. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID K24AI143471]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social innovations in health are inclusive solutions that aim to address healthcare delivery gaps through a multi-stakeholder, community-engaged process. The SIFHR Checklist, developed through a global open call and a 3-round Delphi process, will strengthen reporting transparency and end-user engagement in social innovation projects. Further research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovation for health.
Background Social innovations in health are inclusive solutions to address the healthcare delivery gap that meet the needs of end users through a multi-stakeholder, community-engaged process. While social innovations in health have shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, more research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovation. Research checklists can standardize and improve reporting of research findings, promote transparency, and increase replicability of study results and findings. Methods and findings The research checklist was developed through a 3-step community-engaged process, including a global open call for ideas, a scoping review, and a 3-round modified Delphi process. The call for entries solicited checklists and related items and was open between November 27, 2019 and February 1, 2020. In addition to the open call submissions and scoping review findings, a 17-item Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR) Checklist was developed based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist. The checklist was then refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys conducted between May and June 2020. The resulting checklist will facilitate more complete and transparent reporting, increase end-user engagement, and help assess social innovation projects. A limitation of the open call was requiring internet access, which likely discouraged participation of some subgroups. Conclusions The SIFHR Checklist will strengthen the reporting of social innovation in health research studies. More research is needed on social innovation for health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据