4.6 Article

Comprehensive glycoproteomics shines new light on the complexity and extent of glycosylation in archaea

期刊

PLOS BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001277

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG Postdoctoral Fellowship) [398625447]
  2. National Science Foundation [1817518]
  3. National Institute of Health (NIH) [AI118891]
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1817518] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study extended the phenotypic characterization of N-glycosylation pathway mutants in Haloferax volcanii and provided a detailed glycoproteome for this model archaeon. Through in-depth glycoproteomic analyses, the largest archaeal glycoproteome described so far was identified, revealing the complexity of N-glycosylation pathways in archaeal cell biology.
Glycosylation is one of the most complex posttranslational protein modifications. Its importance has been established not only for eukaryotes but also for a variety of prokaryotic cellular processes, such as biofilm formation, motility, and mating. However, comprehensive glycoproteomic analyses are largely missing in prokaryotes. Here, we extend the phenotypic characterization of N-glycosylation pathway mutants in Haloferax volcanii and provide a detailed glycoproteome for this model archaeon through the mass spectrometric analysis of intact glycopeptides. Using in-depth glycoproteomic datasets generated for the wild-type (WT) and mutant strains as well as a reanalysis of datasets within the Archaeal Proteome Project (ArcPP), we identify the largest archaeal glycoproteome described so far. We further show that different N-glycosylation pathways can modify the same glycosites under the same culture conditions. The extent and complexity of the Hfx. volcanii N-glycoproteome revealed here provide new insights into the roles of N-glycosylation in archaeal cell biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据