4.3 Article

Three Versions of the Perceived Stress Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in a Nationally Representative Sample of Chinese Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168312

关键词

Chinese Perceived Stress Scale; reliability; validity; general population; COVID-19

资金

  1. East China Normal University's COVID-19 Prevention special project [2020ECNU-FZZX-06]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [18BSH129]
  3. Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [2017BSH004]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program of China [12PJC037]
  5. Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [20DZ2260300]
  6. Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan of the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [20DZ2304400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to validate three versions of the Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS) in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that all three versions (CPSS-14, CPSS-10, and CPSS-4) were suitable for use in research with adults in China, with CPSS-10 being a more convenient option due to its shorter length.
(1) Background: The COVID-19 outbreak has created pressure in people's daily lives, further threatening public health. Thus, it is important to assess people's perception of stress during COVID-19 for both research and practical purposes. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is one of the most widely used instruments to measure perceived stress; however, previous validation studies focused on specific populations, possibly limiting the generalization of results. (2) Methods: This study tested the psychometric properties of three versions of the Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-14, CPSS-10, and CPSS-4) in the Chinese general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. A commercial online survey was employed to construct a nationally representative sample of 1133 adults in Mainland China (548 males and 585 females) during a one-week period. (3) Results: The two-factor (positivity and negativity) solution for the three versions of the CPSS showed a good fit with the data. The CPSS-14 and CPSS-10 had very good reliability and the CPSS-4 showed acceptable reliability, supporting the concurrent validity of the CPSS. (4) Conclusions: All three versions of the CPSS appear to be appropriate for use in research with samples of adults in the Chinese general population under the COVID-19 crisis. The CPSS-10 and CPSS-14 both have strong psychometric properties, but the CPSS-10 would have more utility because it is shorter than the CPSS-14. However, the CPSS-4 is an acceptable alternative when administration time is limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据