4.3 Article

MCR: Open-Source Software to Automate Compilation of Health Study Report-Back

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18116104

关键词

report-back; health equity; community engagement; data sharing; software

资金

  1. Center for Research on Social Stressors in Housing Across the Life Course (CRESSH)
  2. NIH/NIHMD [P50 MD010428]
  3. US EPA [RD83615601]
  4. BU SPH Early Career Catalyst Award
  5. NIEHS T32 grant [ES014562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing an open-source tool called MCR for automating compilation of health study reports has shown to save time, improve report quality, and enhance creativity among researchers.
Sharing individualized results with health study participants, a practice we and others refer to as report-back, ensures participant access to exposure and health information and may promote health equity. However, the practice of report-back and the content shared is often limited by the time-intensive process of personalizing reports. Software tools that automate creation of individualized reports have been built for specific studies, but are largely not open-source or broadly modifiable. We created an open-source and generalizable tool, called the Macro for the Compilation of Report-backs (MCR), to automate compilation of health study reports. We piloted MCR in two environmental exposure studies in Massachusetts, USA, and interviewed research team members (n = 7) about the impact of MCR on the report-back process. Researchers using MCR created more detailed reports than during manual report-back, including more individualized numerical, text, and graphical results. Using MCR, researchers saved time producing draft and final reports. Researchers also reported feeling more creative in the design process and more confident in report-back quality control. While MCR does not expedite the entire report-back process, we hope that this open-source tool reduces the barriers to personalizing health study reports, promotes more equitable access to individualized data, and advances self-determination among participants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据