4.3 Article

Roles of Hostility and Depression in the Association between the MAOA Gene Polymorphism and Internet Gaming Disorder

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136910

关键词

MAOA EcoRV polymorphism; hostility; bioamine; internet gaming disorder

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST109-2314-B-037-081-, MOST107-2314-B-037-101-MY2]
  2. Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital [H-109-004]
  3. Kaohsiung Medical University [NCTUKMU109-BIO-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that the MAOA EcoRV gene polymorphism is associated with the development of internet gaming disorder (IGD), with the TT genotype having a higher risk of IGD. Additionally, expressive hostility behavior and hostility cognition mediate the relationship between the MAOA gene and IGD.
The metabolism of bioamine in the central nervous system contributes to the development of addiction. We examined the roles of hostility and depression in the association between internet gaming disorder (IGD) and monoamine oxidase-A (MAOA) EcoRV polymorphism (rs1137070). A total of 69 adults with IGD and 138 without IGD were recruited through diagnostic interviewing. We evaluated participants for rs1137070, depression, and hostility. The participants with the TT genotype of rs1137070 had a higher odds ratio of 2.52 (1.37-4.64) for IGD compared with the C carriers. Expressive hostility behavior and hostility cognition mediated the association between rs1137070 and IGD. Indicating lower MAOA activity, the TT genotype predicted IGD and higher expressive hostility behavior and hostility cognition. Expressive hostility behavior and hostility cognition may underline the association between rs1137070 and IGD. Assessment of and intervention for hostility behavior and cognition should be provided to attenuate the risk of IGD, particularly in those with the TT genotype. Further brain imaging or neurobiological studies are required to elucidate the possible mechanism underlying the association between MAOA activity and IGD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据