4.3 Article

Across-Platform Imputation of DNA Methylation Levels Incorporating Nonlocal Information Using Penalized Functional Regression

期刊

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 333-340

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21969

关键词

DNA methylation; imputation; penalized functional regression; epigenome-wide association study

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA142538] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01HG006292, R01HG006703, R01 HG006703, R01 HG006292] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01MH105561, R01 MH105561] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA methylation is a key epigenetic mark involved in both normal development and disease progression. Recent advances in high-throughput technologies have enabled genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation. However, DNA methylation profiling often employs different designs and platforms with varying resolution, which hinders joint analysis of methylation data from multiple platforms. In this study, we propose a penalized functional regression model to impute missing methylation data. By incorporating functional predictors, our model utilizes information from nonlocal probes to improve imputation quality. Here, we compared the performance of our functional model to linear regression and the best single probe surrogate in real data and via simulations. Specifically, we applied different imputation approaches to an acute myeloid leukemia dataset consisting of 194 samples and our method showed higher imputation accuracy, manifested, for example, by a 94% relative increase in information content and up to 86% more CpG sites passing post-imputation filtering. Our simulated association study further demonstrated that our method substantially improves the statistical power to identify trait-associated methylation loci. These findings indicate that the penalized functional regression model is a convenient and valuable imputation tool for methylation data, and it can boost statistical power in downstream epigenome-wide association study (EWAS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据