4.7 Article

Single-cell exome sequencing reveals multiple subclones in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

期刊

GENOME MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00962-3

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Single-cell DNA sequencing; Tumour metastasis

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [91631111, 31571327, 31771426]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871971]
  3. Science and Technology Key Project of Guangdong Province, China [2019B020229002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, despite low genomic divergence between primary and metastatic cancers in bulk data, single-cell whole-exome sequencing data revealed rare mutations and defined two separate cell populations, indicating diverse evolutionary trajectories between primary and metastatic tumor cells. Additionally, 24 metastatic cell-specific mutated genes were identified and their functions in cell migration capacity were validated.
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cancer type whose mechanism of metastasis remains elusive. Methods In this study, we characterised the evolutionary pattern of metastatic CRC (mCRC) by analysing bulk and single-cell exome sequencing data of primary and metastatic tumours from 7 CRC patients with liver metastases. Here, 7 CRC patients were analysed by bulk whole-exome sequencing (WES); 4 of these were also analysed using single-cell sequencing. Results Despite low genomic divergence between paired primary and metastatic cancers in the bulk data, single-cell WES (scWES) data revealed rare mutations and defined two separate cell populations, indicative of the diverse evolutionary trajectories between primary and metastatic tumour cells. We further identified 24 metastatic cell-specific-mutated genes and validated their functions in cell migration capacity. Conclusions In summary, scWES revealed rare mutations that failed to be detected by bulk WES. These rare mutations better define the distinct genomic profiles of primary and metastatic tumour cell clones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据