4.5 Article

Influence of the large-Z effect during contact between butterfly sister species

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 11, 期 17, 页码 11615-11626

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7785

关键词

gene cluster; hybrid incompatibility; introgression; sex chromosome; speciation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM127390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that diverged butterfly populations in North America exhibit high levels of divergence on the Z chromosome compared to autosomes. Simulation results suggest that closely linked interacting gene clusters on the Z chromosome increase levels of divergence, consistent with the distribution of functionally related genes in butterfly genomes.
Recently diverged butterfly populations in North America have been found to exhibit high levels of divergence on the Z chromosome relative to autosomes, as measured by fixation index, Fst. The pattern of divergence appears to result from accumulation of incompatible alleles, obstructing introgression on the Z chromosome in hybrids (i.e., the large-Z effect); however, it is unknown whether this mechanism is sufficient to explain the data. Here, we simulate the effects of hybrid incompatibility on interbreeding butterfly populations using a model in which populations accumulate cross-incompatible alleles in allopatry prior to contact. We compute statistics for introgression and population divergence during contact between model populations and compare our results to those for 15 pairs of butterfly species interbreeding along a suture zone in central Texas. Time scales for allopatry and contact in the model are scaled to glacial and interglacial periods during which real populations evolved in isolation and contact. We find that the data for butterflies are explained well by an otherwise neutral model under slow fusion conditions. In particular, levels of divergence on the Z chromosome increase when interacting clusters of genes are closely linked, consistent with clusters of functionally related genes in butterfly genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据