4.5 Article

Neural activation to loss and reward among alcohol naive adolescents who later initiate alcohol use

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100978

关键词

Loss; Reward; Win; Adolescent; fMRI; Alcohol use; Initiation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-DA033431, F31-DA051154]
  2. NSF [DGE: 1922598]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that increased neural activation to loss in adolescents who initiate alcohol use may indicate initial vulnerability to alcohol use in adolescence. These results highlight the importance of neural activation in brain regions associated with salience, error detection/self-referential processing, and sensorimotor function in understanding adolescent alcohol initiation.
Adolescent alcohol use is associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes, including an increased risk of alcohol use disorder in adulthood. It is therefore important to identify risk factors of alcohol initiation in adolescence. Research to date has shown that altered neural activation to reward is associated with alcohol use in adolescence; however, few studies have focused on neural activation to loss and alcohol use. The current study examined neural activation to loss and reward among 64 alcohol naive 12-14 year olds that did (n = 20) and did not initiate alcohol use by a three year follow-up period. Results showed that compared to adolescents that did not initiate alcohol use, adolescents that did initiate alcohol use by the three year follow-up period had increased activation to loss in the left striatum (i.e., putamen), right precuneus, and the brainstem/pons when they were alcohol naive at baseline. By contrast, alcohol initiation was not associated with neural activation to winning a reward. These results suggest that increased activation in brain regions implicated in salience, error detection/ self-referential processing, and sensorimotor function, especially to negative outcomes, may represent an initial vulnerability factor for alcohol use in adolescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据