4.3 Article

Mendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope

期刊

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040501

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit from the UK Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00011/1]
  2. University of Bristol [MC_UU_00011/1]
  3. MRC [MC_UU_00011/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a method for studying the causal effects of modifiable exposures on health, social, and economic outcomes using genetic variants. By using randomly inherited genetic variants as a tool, MR provides a more accurate estimation of the relationship between risk factors and outcomes, reducing confounding and bias. As genetic data and resources become more abundant and accessible, the scope of MR applications continues to expand.
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a method of studying the causal effects of modifiable exposures (i.e., potential risk factors) on health, social, and economic outcomes using genetic variants associated with the specific exposures of interest. MR provides a more robust understanding of the influence of these exposures on outcomes because germline genetic variants are randomly inherited from parents to offspring and, as a result, should not be related to potential confounding factors that influence exposure-outcome associations. The genetic variant can therefore be used as a tool to link the proposed risk factor and outcome, and to estimate this effect with less confounding and bias than conventional epidemiological approaches. We describe the scope of MR, highlighting the range of applications being made possible as genetic data sets and resources become larger and more freely available. We outline the MR approach in detail, covering concepts, assumptions, and estimation methods. We cover some common misconceptions, provide strategies for overcoming violation of assumptions, and discuss future prospects for extending the clinical applicability, methodological innovations, robustness, and generalizability of MR findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据