4.8 Article

Repeated nuclear translocations underlie photoreceptor positioning and lamination of the outer nuclear layer in the mammalian retina

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109461

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society [UF120046, RG080398]
  2. Moorfields Eye Charity [ST1209J, E170004A, R150032A, R180005A]
  3. Fight for Sight [1448, 1449]
  4. RP Fighting Blindness
  5. Medical Research Council UK [mr/j004553/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust [082217]
  7. UCL Grand Challenge PhD student
  8. Fight for Sight-funded post-doctoral research associate
  9. Royal Society [UF120046] Funding Source: Royal Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that photoreceptors undergo cyclic rapid nuclear translocation during development to ensure their correct positioning in the retina. Attenuating dynein 1 function results in abnormal photoreceptor displacement and compromised synapse formation.
In development, almost all stratified neurons must migrate from their birthplace to the appropriate neural layer. Photoreceptors reside in the most apical layer of the retina, near their place of birth. Whether photoreceptors require migratory events for fine-positioning and/or retention within this layer is not well understood. Here, we show that photoreceptor nuclei of the developing mouse retina cyclically exhibit rapid, dynein-1-dependent translocation toward the apical surface, before moving more slowly in the basal direction, likely due to passive displacement by neighboring retinal nuclei. Attenuating dynein 1 function in rod photoreceptors results in their ectopic basal displacement into the outer plexiform layer and inner nuclear layer. Synapse formation is also compromised in these displaced cells. We propose that repeated, apically directed nuclear translocation events are necessary to ensure retention of post-mitotic photoreceptors within the emerging outer nuclear layer during retinogenesis, which is critical for correct neuronal lamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据