4.8 Article

Light regulates alternative splicing outcomes via the TOR kinase pathway

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109676

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P26333, DK W1207, SFBF43-P10]
  2. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DP5OD023072]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Argentina [PICT 2016-4366, PICT 2017-1343, PICT 2019-01690]
  4. EMBO [ALTF_1337-2012]
  5. [P330888]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research reveals that light regulates the expression of splicing-related factors in the roots of plants and that alternative splicing responses in roots are likely triggered by photosynthesized sugars. The TOR kinase plays a crucial role in the shoot-to-root signaling pathway, and mitochondrial activity modulates splicing decisions in roots. By activating the TOR pathway, sugars act as mobile signals to coordinate alternative splicing responses to light throughout the whole plant.
For plants, light is the source of energy and the most relevant regulator of growth and adaptations to the environment by inducing changes in gene expression at various levels, including alternative splicing. Light-triggered chloroplast retrograde signals control alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Here, we provide evidence that light regulates the expression of a core set of splicing-related factors in roots. Alternative splicing responses in roots are not directly caused by light but are instead most likely triggered by photo-synthesized sugars. The target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase plays a key role in this shoot-to-root signaling pathway. Knocking down TOR expression or pharmacologically inhibiting TOR activity disrupts the alternative splicing responses to light and exogenous sugars in roots. Consistently, splicing decisions are modulated by mitochondrial activity in roots. In conclusion, by activating the TOR pathway, sugars act as mobile signals to coordinate alternative splicing responses to light throughout the whole plant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据