4.8 Article

Gain-of-function p53R172H mutation drives accumulation of neutrophils in pancreatic tumors, promoting resistance to immunotherapy

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109578

关键词

-

资金

  1. Perlmutter Cancer Center grant [P30CA016087]
  2. NIBIB grant [NIH P41 EB017183]
  3. NIH/NCI [CA210263]
  4. Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Dream Team [SU2C-AACR-DT14-14]
  5. NIH [K08CA241341, F30 CA243205]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health research fellowship [146792]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor genotype can influence the immune microenvironment in pancreatic cancer, leading to changes in immune cell populations and affecting treatment outcomes. Depletion of neutrophils in CRISPR Kras(G12D/+);Trp53(R172H/+) tumors can enhance the efficacy of CD40 immunotherapy and chemotherapy.
Tumor genotype can influence the immune microenvironment, which plays a critical role in cancer development and therapy resistance. However, the immune effects of gain-of-function Trp53 mutations have not been defined in pancreatic cancer. We compare the immune profiles generated by KrasG12D-mutated mouse pancreatic ductal epithelial cells (PDECs) engineered genetically to express the Trp53(R172H) mutation with their p53wild-type control. Kras(G12D/+);Trp53(R172H/+) tumors have a distinct immune profile characterized by an influx of CD11b(+)Ly6G(+) neutrophils and concomitant decreases in CD3(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, and CD4(+) T helper 1 cells. Knockdown of CXCL2, a neutrophil chemokine, in the tumor epithelial compartment of CRISPR Kras(G12D/+);Trp53(R172H/+) PDEC tumors reverses the neutrophil phenotype. Neutrophil depletion of mice bearing CRISPR Kras(G12D/+);Trp53(R172H/+) tumors augments sensitivity to combined CD40 immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These data link Trp53(R172H) to the presence of intratumoral neutrophils in pancreatic cancer and suggest that tumor genotypes could inform selection of affected individuals for immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据