4.8 Article

Brain erythropoietin fine-tunes a counterbalance between neurodifferentiation and microglia in the adult hippocampus

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109548

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Research Center for Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CNMPB)
  3. DFG [TRR 274/1 2020-408885537, GSC 226]
  4. Peter and Traudl Engelhorn Foundation
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RTI2018-098269-B-I00]
  6. Advanced Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  7. ERC Advanced Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that in the adult hippocampus, EPO expression promotes the differentiation of new neurons, increases dendritic spine density, and is associated with a decrease in microglia numbers.
In adult cornu ammonis hippocampi, erythropoietin (EPO) expression drives the differentiation of new neurons, independent of DNA synthesis, and increases dendritic spine density. This substantial brain hardware upgrade is part of a regulatory circle: during motor-cognitive challenge, neurons experience functional hypoxia, triggering neuronal EPO production, which in turn promotes improved performance. Here, we show an unexpected involvement of resident microglia. During EPO upregulation and stimulated neurodifferentiation, either by functional or inspiratory hypoxia, microglia numbers decrease. Treating mice with recombinant human (rh)EPO or exposure to hypoxia recapitulates these changes and reveals the involvement of neuronally expressed IL-34 and microglial CSF1R. Surprisingly, EPO affects microglia in phases, initially by inducing apoptosis, later by reducing proliferation, and overall dampens microglia activity and metabolism, as verified by selective genetic targeting of either the microglial or pyramidal neuronal EPO receptor. We suggest that during accelerating neuronal differentiation, EPO acts as regulator of the CSF1R-dependent microglia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据