4.2 Article

RNA decay systems enhance reciprocal switching of sense and antisense transcripts in response to glucose starvation

期刊

GENES TO CELLS
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 1276-1289

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12443

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellowships, Platform for Dynamic Approaches to Living System from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [268792, 3114003, 21241046, 26291018]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21241046, 14J08792, 26291018] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antisense RNA has emerged as a crucial regulator of opposite-strand protein-coding genes in the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) category, but little is known about their dynamics and decay process in the context of a stress response. Antisense transcripts from the fission yeast fbp1 locus (fbp1-as) are expressed in glucose-rich conditions and anticorrelated with transcription of metabolic stress-induced lncRNA (mlonRNA) and mRNA on the sense strand during glucose starvation. Here, we investigate the localization and decay of antisense RNAs at fbp1 and other loci, and propose a model to explain the rapid switch between antisense and sense mlonRNA/mRNA transcription triggered by glucose starvation. We show that fbp1-as shares many features with mRNAs, such as a 5'-cap and poly(A)-tail, and that its decay partially depends upon Rrp6, a cofactor of the nuclear exosome complex involved in 3'-5' degradation of RNA. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and polysome fractionation show that the majority of remaining fbp1-as localizes to the cytoplasm and binds to polyribosomes in glucose-rich conditions. Furthermore, fbp1-as and antisense RNA at other stress-responsive loci are promptly degraded via the cotranslational nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway. These results suggest NMD may potentiate the swift disappearance of antisense RNAs in response to cellular stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据