4.6 Article

Utilisation of district health information system and its associated factors among health professionals working at public health facilities of the southwest of Ethiopia: cross-sectional survey

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046578

关键词

health informatics; information management; telemedicine; information technology; public health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicated that health professionals in the southwest of Ethiopia showed good utilization of the district health information system, with factors such as having sufficient skills, being trained, high motivation, receiving feedback, and regular supervision being associated with its utilization.
Objectives To assess utilisation of district health information system and its associated factors among health professionals in the southwest of Ethiopia, 2020. Setting Public health facilities in the southwest of Ethiopia. Participants A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of 260 participants. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was utilisation of the district health information system. Results Overall, 149 (57.3%) of study participants had good utilisation of district health information systems (95% CI 50 to 64.2). Sufficient skills (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 3.83, 95% CI 1.92 to 7.64), being trained (AOR 3.90, 95% CI 1.95 to 7.79), high motivation (AOR 3.93, 95% CI 1.99 to 7.76), feedback provided (AOR 2.93, 95% CI 1.53 to 5.77) and regular supervision (AOR 3.06, 95% CI 1.56 to 6.01) were associated with utilisation of district health information systems. Conclusions In general, more than half of the respondents had good utilisation of district health information systems. Providing regular supportive supervision and feedback, having good skills on district health information system use, high motivation and being trained on district health information system will help to bring good utilisation of district health information system for decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据