4.6 Review

Adverse events associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053302

关键词

endoscopy; hepatobiliary disease; pancreatic disease

资金

  1. N.B. Hershfield Chair in Therapeutic Endoscopy, University of Calgary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to systematically review the adverse event rates of ERCP and report up-to-date pooled estimates. A comprehensive search will be conducted on relevant medical databases to assess the quality and abstract data for meta-analysis. The findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Introduction Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed to diagnose and manage conditions of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Though effective, it is associated with common adverse events (AEs). The purpose of this study is to systematically review ERCP AE rates and report up-to-date pooled estimates. Methods and analysis A comprehensive electronic search will be conducted of relevant medical databases through 10 November 2020. A study team of eight data abstracters will independently determine study eligibility, assess quality and abstract data in parallel, with any two concordant entries constituting agreement and with discrepancies resolved by consensus. The primary outcome will be the pooled incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, with secondary outcomes including post-ERCP bleeding, cholangitis, perforation, cholecystitis, death and unplanned healthcare encounters. Secondary outcomes will also include rates of specific and overall AEs within clinically relevant subgroups determined a priori. DerSimonian and Laird random effects models will be used to perform meta-analyses of these outcomes. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored via meta-regression. Subgroup analyses based on median dates of data collection across studies will be performed to determine whether AE rates have changed over time. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is a planned meta-analysis of previously published data. Participant consent is similarly not required. Dissemination is planned via presentation at relevant conferences in addition to publication in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020220221.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据