4.6 Review

Index-Based Dietary Patterns and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

期刊

ADVANCES IN NUTRITION
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 2288-2300

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmab069

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; dietary patterns; dietary index; Mediterranean diet; diet inflammatory index

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870384, 81630018]
  2. Leona M & Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust [2019PG-CD018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mediterranean diet was found to be negatively associated with the risk and progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), while a diet with high inflammatory potential could increase the risk and aggravate disease activity in IBD. Dietary scores have the potential to evaluate the association between overall diet quality and the risk and progression of IBD.
Diet is one of the most critical factors for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A whole dietary pattern should be considered when doing nutrient-based research to preserve the potential for synergism between nutrients. Dietary indices are important tools to evaluate diet quality, and we investigated the associations of it with IBD. Fourteen studies on the relation between index-based dietary patterns and IBD were included. 6 studies showed the relation between index-based dietary patterns and IBD risk, 7 studies explored the dietary indices and progression of IBD, and 1 study investigated the relationship between index and all-cause mortality in IBD patients. These results implied that a high score on the Mediterranean diet was negatively associated with risk and progression of IBD. However, a diet with high inflammatory potential could increase risk and aggravate disease activity in IBD. Dietary scores have the potential to evaluate the association between overall diet quality and risk and progression of IBD. Future randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the effect of the change in dietary score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据