4.7 Article

A Ratiometric Dual Color Luciferase Reporter for Fast Characterization of Transcriptional Regulatory Elements in Plants

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 2763-2766

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00248

关键词

synthetic biology; transcriptional regulation; reporter assay; luciferase; plant

资金

  1. USDA BBT EAGER award [2019-67013-29104]
  2. USDA NIFA award [2018-6702127964]
  3. Resnick Sustainability Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. USDA BBT-EAGER award [201967013-29012]
  5. HHMI Faculty Scholar fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcriptional reporter assays are crucial in plant synthetic biology for constructing complex genetic circuits and understanding gene expression control. The dual color luciferase ratiometric reporter system developed in this study offers advantages including speed, cost-effectiveness, and reduced variability.
Plant synthetic biology requires precise characterization of genetic elements to construct complex genetic circuits that can improve plant traits or confer them with new characteristics. Transcriptional reporter assays are essential to quantify the effect of gene expression regulator elements. Additionally, transcriptional reporter systems are a key tool in understanding control of gene expression in biology. In this work, we construct and characterize a dual color luciferase ratiometric reporter system that possesses several advantages over currently used reporters. It is ratiometric, thus reducing variability and increasing consistency between experiments; it is fast, as both reporters can be measured at the same time in a single reaction, and it is less expensive to perform than current dual luciferase reporter assays. We have validated our system quantifying the transcriptional capability of a panel of promoters and terminators commonly used in synthetic biology with a broad range of expression magnitudes, and in a biologically relevant system, nitrate response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据