4.7 Article

Emotional distress among frontline research staff

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 281, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114101

关键词

Research ethics; Global health; Researcher trauma; HIV; Eswatini; Public health

资金

  1. Fordham University Research Ethics Training Institute (RETI) [R25DA031608]
  2. NIMH grant [K01MH112436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that frontline research staff in Eswatini commonly experience emotional distress, which is exacerbated by the high rates of HIV, violence, and poverty in the region. The qualities study staff are often hired for, such as empathy and emotional intelligence, may also contribute to their distress. Recommendations for addressing this emotional distress included regular meetings with a trained counselor and incorporating team-building or debriefing conversations into the normal workweek.
Public health research frequently deals with sensitive topics. A growing body of evidence suggests that frontline researchers who elicit or process participant's traumatic experiences are themselves at risk of developing emotional distress or secondary trauma from daily immersion in these data. This both threatens a study's data quality and calls into question how the harms and benefits of conducting research are distributed across a study team. The objective of this study was to explore how frontline research staff in Eswatini experience and process emotional distress as part of their daily work and to describe potential strategies for resilience and coping using qualitative research methods. We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with informants who had worked in data collection, data entry, and transcription on a number of sensitive topics, including HIV, sex work, and LGBT health. We found that emotional distress is a salient experience among frontline research staff working in Eswatini. This distress stems from conducting research against a generalized backdrop of high rates of HIV, violence, and poverty, particularly since research staff are drawn from affected communities and have their own firsthand knowledge of the phenomena they are studying. Moreover, the qualities study staff are often hired for - empathy, compassion, and emotional intelligence - are also traits that may increase their likelihood of feeling distressed by the narratives they encounter in their work. The workplace can serve as a prism, exacerbating or potentially mitigating these risks into harm at the individual, interpersonal, and community level. While not all study teams may have access to formal mental health services, several informants recommended incorporating regular meetings with a trained counselor as part of the overall project. Others recommended building time for team-building or debriefing conversations into the normal workweek, a strategy that would address both the issue of workload and could bolster the already existent strategy of relying on team members for mental health support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据