4.7 Article

If a rabbi did say 'you have to vaccinate,' we wouldn't: Unveiling the secular logics of religious exemption and opposition to vaccination

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114052

关键词

Coronavirus; Israel; Measles; Religion; United Kingdom; Vaccine mandates

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [101955/Z/13/Z]
  2. Lady Davis Fellowship
  3. Wellcome Trust [101955/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maintaining 'faith' in vaccination has become a public health challenge amid outbreaks of preventable diseases among religious minorities and the outbreak of the coronavirus. Orthodox Jewish parents, while more concerned with safety, trust, and choice similar to 'secular' logics of non-vaccination, mobilized and at times politicized religious frameworks to fit the discourse of 'exemption'. The paper introduces the concept of 'political immunities' to understand how health, law, and religion intersect in contemporary vaccine opposition.
Maintaining 'faith' in vaccination has emerged as a public health challenge amidst outbreaks of preventable disease among religious minorities and rising claims to 'exemption' from vaccine mandates. Outbreaks of measles and coronavirus have been particularly acute among Orthodox Jewish neighbourhoods in North America, Europe and Israel, yet no comparative studies have been conducted to discern the shared and situated influences on vaccine decision-making. This paper synthesises qualitative research into vaccine decision-making among Orthodox Jews in the United Kingdom and Israel during the 2014-15 and 2018-19 measles epidemics, and 2020-21 coronavirus pandemic. The methods integrate 66 semi-structured informal interviews conducted with parents, formal and informal healthcare practitioners, and religious leaders, as well as analysis of tailored non-vaccination advocacy events and literature. The paper argues that the discourse of 'religious' exemption and opposition to vaccination obscures the diverse practices and philosophies that inform vaccine decisions, and how religious law and leaders form a contingent influence. Rather than viewing religion as the primary framework through which vaccine decisions are made, Orthodox Jewish parents were more concerned with safety, trust and choice in similar ways to 'secular' logics of non-vaccination. Yet, religious frameworks were mobilised, and at times politicised, to suit medico-legal discourse of 'exemption' from coercive or mandatory vaccine policies. By conceptualising tensions around protection as 'political immunities,' the paper offers a model to inform social science understandings of how health, law and religion intersect in contemporary vaccine opposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据