4.4 Article

Thermal analysis of marine structural steel EH36 subject to non-spreading cryogenic spills. Part I: experimental study

期刊

SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 1863-1871

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2021.1950346

关键词

Cryogenic spill; marine steel; offshore; experimental; thermal analysis; boiling

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway through the Centers of Excellence funding scheme, project AMOS [223254]
  2. Research Council of Norway through the Centers for Research-based Innovation funding scheme, project CASA [237885]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the impact of LNG spills on the integrity of marine steel structures, conducting thermal-structural analysis and pool boiling tests on steel specimens under non-spreading cryogenic spills. The research also discusses the effect of surface roughness on cooling rates and boiling regimes. Numerical simulations of the experiments resulted in a heat flux curve for EH36 steel-LN2 pool boiling.
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) spills may cause steel to embrittle, leading to the brittle fracture of marine structures due to the cryogenic temperatures. For the integrity assessment of marine steel structures in the event of an LNG spill, first and foremost, an accurate heat transfer analysis is required. This study presents an experimental set-up that allows for thermal-structural analysis of steel structures subject to non-spreading cryogenic spills. A local, non-spreading cryogenic spill was replicated by building a liquid nitrogen (LN2) pool at the central zone of an EH36 steel plate under tensile loading. Six pool boiling tests were conducted on six different specimens. Temperature histories recorded by nine thermocouples are presented and discussed as well as the effect of surface roughness on cooling rates and boiling regimes. Numerical simulations of the experiments, discussed in Part II of this study, resulted in a heat flux curve for EH36 steel-LN2 pool boiling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据