4.7 Article

Nationwide case-control study of risk factors and outcomes for community-acquired sepsis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94558-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Carnegie Hero Funds
  2. Karolinska Institute
  3. Swedish Society of Medicine
  4. Stockholm County Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that patients with sepsis had a higher proportion of comorbidities at ICU admission, and were more likely to have low income and education level. Risk factors associated with ICU admission for sepsis patients included renal disease, liver disease, metastatic malignancy, substance abuse, and congestive heart failure. The adjusted odds ratio for 30-day mortality in sepsis patients was 132 compared to controls.
Sepsis is the main cause of death in the intensive care units (ICU) and increasing incidences of ICU admissions for sepsis are reported. Identification of patients at risk for sepsis and poor outcome is therefore of outmost importance. We performed a nation-wide case-control study aiming at identifying and quantifying the association between co-morbidity and socio-economic factors with intensive care admission for community-acquired sepsis. We also explored 30-day mortality. All adult patients (n=10,072) with sepsis admitted from an emergency department to an intensive care unit in Sweden between 2008 and 2017 and a control population (n=50,322), matched on age, sex and county were included. In the sepsis group, 69% had a co-morbid condition at ICU admission, compared to 31% in the control group. Multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was performed and there was a large variation in the influence of different risk factors associated with ICU-admission, renal disease, liver disease, metastatic malignancy, substance abuse, and congestive heart failure showed the strongest associations. Low income and low education level were more common in sepsis patients compared to controls. The adjusted OR for 30-day mortality for sepsis patients was 132 (95% CI 110-159) compared to controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据